Linux Mint 6.0 vs Linux openSUSE 11.1?
Question: I'm a linux newbie and i can't decide which of these distributions is best for me. I'm considering mint since it has flash video enabled on it by default but i'm also considering SUSE since i hear it's easier to use and has more drivers readily available for usb devices. consider: I ran suse for a day with the live cd (the KDE) and i REALLY liked it. i just had trouble installing anything on it---the flash video plugin (like i said, i'm a newbie) so i went to mint (gnome) and though it doesn't have much eye-candy, it has the flash plug ins and it has very convenient GUI tools for installing programs (such as the package manager and the software manager). however i ran into issues when trying to install some of my usb devices since i really don't know my way around the linux terminal. which distribution do you guys recommend/prefer?
Best Answers: Linux Mint 6.0 vs Linux openSUSE 11.1?
Linux Mint 6.0 vs Linux openSUSE 11.1 ? This is almost a Gnome vs KDE question. Driver support is far better for Mint with much Hardware being detected automatically and I have not known of any issues with USB devices. If there is an issue then you can consult the Official Ubuntu USB Devices Documentation which will apply to Mint as well https://help.ubuntu.com/community/USB Mint doesn't have much 'eye candy' ??? You must be joking right. It comes with Compiz 0.7.8 and if anything its too much 'eye candy' for me http://wiki.compiz-fusion.org/CCSM http://wiki.compiz-fusion.org/ My preference is the older minimalistic Beryl 0.2.1 which I have running on my Mint 6 custom LiveDVD http://www.beryl-project.org/features.php Here is how if you are interested. Piratesmacks deb. packages to install Beryl 0.2.1 on Mint 6 http://www.mediafire.com/?ny9jc5bhjtm extract beryl tar.bz2 install debs. Screenshot from my custom LiveDVD of Mint 6 running Beryl 0.2.1 http://s266.photobucket.com/albums/ii256/Linux_Ubuntu_geek/?action=view¤t=Screenshot-1.png I have worked with both OpenSUSE 11 and Mint 6 and the latter wins hands down for me. But it really comes down to Gnome vs KDE doesn't it. LUg.
You seem to be basically comparing server themed linux distros against linux distros designed for desktop use. "Now on to my question do you think that the more GUI focused distros are easier to use than the more CLI focused Linux Distros." Well...duh...but not for the reason that a GUI is provided. In many desktop distros, they put an increased emphasis on hardware detection, and when a driver isn't built in to the kernel...many times there are tools to download the driver for you. When I ran my first linux distro (OPENsuse 10.1 or something like that...) there was a GUI tool to use NDISwrapper. These tools do exist on the server distros, but you usally have to install them. You also have to realize that it depends on the person. Personally I love Archlinux for it's minimalist philosophy. If you don't need it, then it is not installed. However it takes ages to set up and work on even if you know what you are doing. Arch is well known for having the best documentation on almost everything out of any linux distro. I notice that the majority of people in the forums seem to be more helpful then on the ubuntu forums...and better educated to boot. Anyway, if you learn better by having stuff done for you and looking at logs, then yea...a desktop linux might be more approite, but for those people that like to learn things the hard way...nothing beats a man page or a distro that has better documentation AND examples than the man pages.
Definitely Mint over Suse but you could also consider Ubuntu. If you like KDE then try Kubuntu or keep your options open by using the standard Ubuntu which allows you to choose from KDE, Gnome and xfce. If you currently use Windows then you should look at 'wubi' which will allow you to use Ubuntu or Kubuntu. Wubi can be added to and easily removed from windows in 'add/remove software'. This will give you the chance to try out any drivers you are looking at. Ubuntu's GUI software manager is synaptics - most distros have one. Another good option is mandriva - this also has a good software manager and a really good control centre. I would advise Mandriva and Ubuntu over Mint but Mint is okay. http://wubi-installer.org/
set up your laptop (or netbook as is the case) to boot from USB. have a distro installed on a USB drive (flashdrive,thumbdrive, usbkey, what ever you want to call it), unetbootin (http://unetbootin.sourceforge.net/) is a tool that can help you do that, thought Ubuntu has it's own that works pretty well too and there are multiple others. with 2 GB of RAM, Mint should do just fine. I would avoid playing with the partitions on the Windows HD as you could very easily make a mistake and lose it, or Windows, could, via an update, mess up the Linux partition, or at least the boot up process and make Linux inaccessible... some Windows XP updates did that (i'm thinking it might have been a Service Pack but I'm unsure, I did experience the issue though), it wouldn't surprise me that some newer updates could too.
i take advantage of ubuntu because of the fact is extra known and if I even have concern will hit upon a answer extra actually. yet precise after ubuntu is mint. there's a clarification for that. mint provides you finished multimedia help out of the container, which potential you are able to hear to MP3's watch DVD's and consider information superhighway pages that require Flash technologies precise after installation.
ubuntu is way more awkward and difficult to use there are fewer programs , it keeps asking for user name and password all the time , most of what you may need to do is done with command line text instructions some of them quite complex and if you get an instruction wrong it can go and do something else without you realizing it - stay with XP unless you are a computer whiz
If you have your own answer to the question Linux Mint 6.0 vs Linux openSUSE 11.1?, then you can write your own version, using the form below for an extended answer.